Part 40 - Feb 03 2005

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 8:57 am

#1200 Re: [osFree] Re: NuDawn?
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 3, 2005
Tom Lee Mullins wrote:

>
> ....
> > >Sorry about the typo (I blame it on 'typing dyslexia'

).
> > >
> > >Thank you for the information.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Yes, sometimes one finger doesn't know
> > what the others are doing,

.
> >
> > I forgot to mention that anyone can log
> > in at SourceForge and send a
> > message to Patrick Ingle at his
> > address there, which is
> > "Email Address: vcrfix at users.sourceforge.net".
> > Please note that I haven't tried to do so and
> > hope that this action does
> > *not* require a subscription to
> > SourceForge at $39 (USD) per annum.
> > Although I favour support of open
> > source endeavours, it would be a stiff
> > price for an e-mail to discover that the
> > project administrator has
> > abandoned "NuDawn" and has no intention
> > of reviving it.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ciao,
> > Kenn
> >
> I have a login id and password for SourceForge.
> I do not remember being charged for it. It migh
> have changed since I joined. There is also a
> forum there too (you will see that most of the
> posts are from me). I will try to contact him
> via the e-mail).
>
> BigWarpGuy
>
>

I had a login id and password but they no longer seem valid.
I am re-joining and will get a new login id . I have already
'registered' a new password. I have sent an e-mail to the person
(using the e-mail address given). I will report if they respond.

TomLeeM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BigWarpGuy - BigMiniGuy - BigDosGuy
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://tomleem.homestead.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:04 am

#1201 Re: [osFree] NuDawn?
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 3, 2005
....

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Well, there is a "c" in "source", so the URL is
>><http://sourceforge.net/projects/nudawn>.
>>
>>The project looks inactive as you mention, so it would need some
>>publicity and activity to rekindle the interest of the original
>>developer & administrator, Patrick Ingle, as well as garner some
>>interest or support at SourceForge.
>>
>>Here is the data from the above URL:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>NuDawn is an open source operating system guaranteeing support for DOS,
>>Windows (Win16/Win32), and OS/2 applications in one simple, configurable
>>package. Legacy hardware support is the prime directive of NuDawn,
>>allowing the installation on XT/286/386/486
>>This project has not yet categorized itself in the Trove Software Map
>><http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php>.
>>
>>
>>Project UNIX name: nudawn
>>Registered: 2001-05-24 02:55
>>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>>Although very little has been done since the project's inception, there
>>have been 1084 "Page views" over the 1378 days of its existence, with 6
>>views from Jan. 7-15, 2005, if this figure indicates anything meaningful.
>>
>>Personally, I don't like this name and would prefer a synonym for
>>phoenix in the same vein as "Ubuntu".
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Sorry about the typo (I blame it on 'typing dyslexia'

).
>
>Thank you for the information.
>
>
>

I sent the 'Nudawn' webmaster an e-mail and am hoping for a reply
(active, inactive, abandoned?)

--

TomLeeM
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BigWarpGuy - BigMiniGuy - BigDosGuy
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://tomleem.homestead.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:28 am

#1202 Re: [osFree] NuDawn?
Expand Messages

Mark D. Overholser
Mar 3, 2005
Tom Lee Mullins wrote:

> ....
>
>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Well, there is a "c" in "source", so the URL is
>>><http://sourceforge.net/projects/nudawn>.
>>>
>>>The project looks inactive as you mention, so it would need some
>>>publicity and activity to rekindle the interest of the original
>>>developer & administrator, Patrick Ingle, as well as garner some
>>>interest or support at SourceForge.
>>>
>>>Here is the data from the above URL:
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>>NuDawn is an open source operating system guaranteeing support for DOS,
>>>Windows (Win16/Win32), and OS/2 applications in one simple, configurable
>>>package. Legacy hardware support is the prime directive of NuDawn,
>>>allowing the installation on XT/286/386/486
>>>This project has not yet categorized itself in the Trove Software Map
>>><http://sourceforge.net/softwaremap/trove_list.php>.
>>>
>>>
>>>Project UNIX name: nudawn
>>>Registered: 2001-05-24 02:55
>>>
>>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>>
>>>Although very little has been done since the project's inception, there
>>>have been 1084 "Page views" over the 1378 days of its existence, with 6
>>>views from Jan. 7-15, 2005, if this figure indicates anything meaningful.
>>>
>>>Personally, I don't like this name and would prefer a synonym for
>>>phoenix in the same vein as "Ubuntu".
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Sorry about the typo (I blame it on 'typing dyslexia'

).
>>
>>Thank you for the information.
>>
>>
>>
>
> I sent the 'Nudawn' webmaster an e-mail and am hoping for a reply
> (active, inactive, abandoned?)
>

The sad thing is, at their site, there is no Source Code, No Documents,
no Files....

MarkO

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:29 am

#1203 Re: NuDawn?
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 4, 2005
...

> The sad thing is, at their site, there is no Source Code,
> No Documents, no Files....

>
> MarkO

I rarely if ever received a reply when I post at the
forum at the site. I have sent the person an e-mail
and am waiting for a reply.

I even suggested
the person join OSFree but there was no reply.

BigWarpGuy

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:30 am

#1204 Re: Petition at OS/2 World?
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 10, 2005

> There is some discussion of a petition being
> developed at http://www.os2world.com to get
> IBM to release the source code. The idea is to
> write the petition of open sourcing OS/2 as
> not only potentially profitable to IBM but
> also show that they support open source
> projects while giving OS/2 users what they
> want (continued use of OS/2).
>
> TomLeeM/BigWarpGuy

The petition will soon be up at
http://www.os2world.com

BigWarpGuy

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:31 am

#1205 New OS/2 eCS Group
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 18, 2005
I have created a new OS/2 and eCS group.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2-ecs
It is for anything related to or about
OS/2 or eCS. I will try to moderate it
so it will be a civil group discussion.

TomLeeM

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:32 am

#1206 Re: [osFree] New OS/2 eCS Group
Expand Messages

Kenn Yuill
Mar 18, 2005
Tom Lee Mullins wrote as follows on 03/18/05 09:00 AM:

>I have created a new OS/2 and eCS group.
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2-ecs
>It is for anything related to or about
>OS/2 or eCS. I will try to moderate it
>so it will be a civil group discussion.
>
>TomLeeM
>
>
>

Good Luck!
IMHO, there are enough discussion lists for OS/2 at the moment. In
fact, the two lists on NIC.SURFNET.NL, OS2-L & TEAMOS2HELP-L, are
certainly not used as much as in the past and the topics are quite
varied, AFAICT.

--
Ciao,
Kenn
_________________________________________________________
Always act as if life is a joyous journey. - Kenn Yuill

_____ A Quote for Today _____

Not *the* Jane Harrington?
Jane 'Bury Me in a Y-shaped Coffin' Harrington.
- "Edmund Blackadder" (Rowan Atkinson)

_________________________________________________________
* TagZilla 0.057 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:34 am

#1207 Re: New OS/2 eCS Group
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 21, 2005

> >I have created a new OS/2 and eCS group.
> >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2-ecs
> >It is for anything related to or about
> >OS/2 or eCS. I will try to moderate it
> >so it will be a civil group discussion.
> >
> >TomLeeM
> >
> >
> >
>
> Good Luck!
> IMHO, there are enough discussion lists for OS/2 at the moment. In
> fact, the two lists on NIC.SURFNET.NL, OS2-L & TEAMOS2HELP-L, are
> certainly not used as much as in the past and the topics are quite
> varied, AFAICT.
>
> --
> Ciao,
> Kenn
>

It was intended to be a group just so I could post products and
or announcements that are related - in some way - to oS/2 and eCS.
There are others joined the group. I have been accused of
'spamming' an eCS group. I always thought that 'spam' was posts
that were unrelated to the groups topic. By having my own group,
I could post all the OS/2-eCS related topics that I wanted without
being accused of 'spamming'.

There are alot of groups, forums and lists for users of OS/2-eCS.
In a way, a good thing. It shows that there is an interest in
OS/2 and eCS.

TomLeeM

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:35 am

#1208 Re: New OS/2 eCS Group
Expand Messages

Tom Lee Mullins
Mar 21, 2005
....

>
> Good Luck!
> IMHO, there are enough discussion lists for OS/2 at the moment. In
> fact, the two lists on NIC.SURFNET.NL, OS2-L & TEAMOS2HELP-L, are
> certainly not used as much as in the past and the topics are quite
> varied, AFAICT.
>
> --
> Ciao,
> Kenn
>

I just wish there was more groups, lists and forums
on this project. It would be mean more poeple involved
and a greater chance of OSFree succeeding.

TomLeeM

Post by **admin** » Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:36 am

#1209 Re: [osFree] Re: New OS/2 eCS Group
Expand Messages

Kenn Yuill
Mar 21, 2005
Tom Lee Mullins wrote as follows on 03/21/05 12:50 PM:

>
>
>>>I have created a new OS/2 and eCS group.
>>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/os2-ecs
>>>It is for anything related to or about
>>>OS/2 or eCS. I will try to moderate it
>>>so it will be a civil group discussion.
>>>
>>>TomLeeM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Good Luck!
>>IMHO, there are enough discussion lists for OS/2 at the moment. In
>>fact, the two lists on NIC.SURFNET.NL, OS2-L & TEAMOS2HELP-L, are
>>certainly not used as much as in the past and the topics are quite
>>varied, AFAICT.
>>
>>--
>> Ciao,
>> Kenn
>>
>>
>>
>It was intended to be a group just so I could post products and
>or announcements that are related - in some way - to oS/2 and eCS.
>There are others joined the group. I have been accused of
>'spamming' an eCS group. I always thought that 'spam' was posts
>that were unrelated to the groups topic. By having my own group,
>I could post all the OS/2-eCS related topics that I wanted without
>being accused of 'spamming'.
>
>There are alot of groups, forums and lists for users of OS/2-eCS.
>In a way, a good thing. It shows that there is an interest in
>OS/2 and eCS.
>
>
>

I have read the complaints about your multiple posts to some lists and
about them being duplicates of the announcements from V.O.I.C.E News.
Unfortunately, some people become very upset about this practise, as if
it is the "Eleventh Sin", whereas the sane approach is to delete any
duplicated news items as one does for other duplicated e-mail or ones of
no interest. IMHO, the first source of news about OS/2 should be
"V.O.I.C.E. News", but I do laud your desire to keep the OS/2 community
informed of any news related to it. When you announced that your new
group at Yahoo!, I thought that a better name would have been "OS/2
News+" to cover any items not appearing in the V.O.I.C.E. Newsletter or
site, while promoting it as the primary source of news on OS/2 & eCS.
Also, It could have been a forum to discuss all news related directly
and indirectly to OS/2-eCS, especially for those users who prefer e-mail
to newsgroups.

--
Ciao,
Kenn
_________________________________________________________
Always act as if life is a joyous journey. - Kenn Yuill

_____ A Quote for Today _____

Put it before them briefly, so they will read it.
Put it before them clearly, so they will understand it.
Put it before them picturesquely, so they will remember it.
And most of all, accurately, so they will be guided by its light.
- Joseph Pulitzer, U.S. journalist [1847-1911]

_________________________________________________________
* TagZilla 0.057 * http://tagzilla.mozdev.org