osfree.org

Wesley Parish 9.13.2004 I've just had a look at the Odin source, specifically the pe2lx code. I'd say that there's enough there to start writing an OSFree loader - at least, to base one on the definitions in the *.h. All that would need to be done would be to get the Odin folks agreeing to OSFree u...

Yuri Prokushev 8.30.2004 2Sergey Posokhov Also ReactOS is not exactly what we want, but as starting point its preffered kernel because a) already existis all (or most) of required functions b) not so much resource required to make somthing useful. Later ROS can be easely replaced bu other kernel if...

Sergey Posokhov 8.30.2004

Yes, of course, with WPS installed. Time, time...

Yuri Prokushev 8.28.2004

2Anonymous: You talking about known issues.

osFree: an environment subsystem for OS/2 above the ReactOS executive 8.27.2004 If you look at the NT design, you can see how you can implement OS/2 the way MS did, but making it a subsystem process running above the ReactOS executive and kernel. In NT and ReactOS there is the concept of "domi...

Warper 8.25.2004

Of course. I just thought about it. I'll try to contribute to the project later but
I've no experience in OS/2 programming.

Yuri Prokushev 8.25.2004

Warper, still to far for LVM really.

Warper 8.25.2004 Yuri, thanks for your answers. My problem with LVM is that it writes the configuration information to the partition's system area and it can cause many incompatibility problems. I think it would be better to implement a way to handle volumes like Unix and Linux do: partition untouc...

Yuri Prokushev 8.25.2004 1) Still here. At the present time build system preparation in progress 2) ReactOS kernel selected as first kernel (because lack of resources and for ROS kernel not so many forces are required) 3) LVM _much_ better in comparation with FDISK 4) Java will be supported via sub...